Separating certain types of
fiction out from the main collection is a bad idea. Setting up regular displays of different types of books like
street lit, LGBTQ or African American is a great way to promote lesser known
authors and genres. Permanently separating
them isolates them as not a part of mainstream fiction, which of course, they
are. They should be there in the stacks
with everything else, discoverable by all who are browsing.
Where LGBTQ fiction is concerned, a prominent section with
such material is not viable. “It is
important to note that LGBTQ and gender variant youth are not choosing public
libraries because they feel the most comfortable in these spaces; they are
forced to patronize public libraries because of a total lack of support from
other social groups and services” (Robinson, 163). If they are not able to privately browse for
relevant material or feel comfortable getting help finding the materials, they’ll
be less likely to check out information and reading that may change or improve
their lives. If you’re a closeted youth,
desperate to find reading that helps you figure out your journey or you really
want to read a story about someone like yourself, would you be caught dead
perusing the big LGTBQ display? Of
course not! There are other ways to help these people. “Offering printed booklists
with recommended LGBTQ related titles is a guaranteed way of making patrons
aware of such materials 365 days a year” (Ritchie, 62). The article about the Iowa library patrons
wanting to separate the LGTBQ books so that they won’t accidentally burn their righteous
eyes on scandalous filth, made me seethe with fury. I fail to understand why they insist on
trying to subvert everyone else’s rights by screaming about their own religious
rights – their rights not to see anything they don’t believe in! Just, no.
As far as African American authors, why separate them permanently? It is definitely imperative to regularly
promote African American authors with displays and book lists, but these
authors are equal to white authors!
Ralph Ellison, anyone? Alice
Walker? Classic, amazing works!
They belong in the stacks along with Herman Melville and Leo Tolstoy.
I really like the webpage for the Cincinnati Public Library listing
African American authors. This is a
great way to single these works out…without separating them out!
Ritchie, C., & McNeill, D. ( 2011) . LGBTIQ issues in
public libraries. Serving LGBTIQ Library and Archives Users, ed. E. Greenblatt,
59–80. Jefferson, NC and London, England: McFarland & Company Inc.
Robinson, T. (2016 ). Overcoming social exclusion in public library
services to LGBTQ and gender variant youth.
Public Library Quarterly, 35(3),
161-174.
I had the same thoughts - Shelve them together, but promote them with frequent displays and finding aids. (I'm also relieved I wasn't the only one seething with fury over those articles about Orange City, IA!)
ReplyDeleteI absolutely agree that these books should be promoted and displayed, but not shelved differently. Some of the comments from the Iowa tv station and newspaper really showed that this 'controversy' is coming from people pushing for the equivalent of ideological segregation.
ReplyDeleteExcellent, well articulated and argued post. You bring up many great points that strengthen your response. Full points!
ReplyDelete